RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>]

> From: Mark_Andrews at isc.org [mailto:Mark_Andrews at isc.org] 

> 	Note it is possible to upgrade the DNS servers and *still*
> 	have active directory support.

You lose the coupling of AD and DNS.

That seriously impair the DKIM/MARID value proposition. It is a major infrastructure change.


> 	A compentent system administator would use all the 
> tools available
> 	to them.

No a competent admin looks at the cost / benefit. 

> 	The fact that you seem to want to restrict the solution space
> 	to only Microsoft Windows servers on a Windows box is what has
> 	clouded your judgement.

No, the fact that I do not choose to force the products of your employer down people's throats is not an error of judgement on my part.

In my space failing to take account of the largest server provider is a deployment issue. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf