IANA media type registry vs RFC4288

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:05:27 +0100
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666

Hi,

I noted a few days ago that RFC4288 (obsoleting RFC2048) points to <http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/mediatypes.pl> for the registration form, but that form hasn't been updated accordingly (it still refers solely to RFC2048).

Yes, I sent an email to webmaster at iana.org, but didn't get any feedback at all. Maybe somebody over here knows whom to ping?

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  - From: Doug Barton

Prev by Date: RE: SRV records considered dubious
Next by Date: Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
Previous by thread: RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
Next by thread: Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

IANA media type registry vs RFC4288

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.