Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

[Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>]

Brian,
> 1. There's a presumption that "precedence" and "preemption" are the
> mechanisms - but those aren't requirements, they are solutions, and
> it isn't clear to me that they can ever be appropriate solutions
> in the upper layers of the Internet. The requirement is presumably
> that important application level sessions succeed in emergency 
> situations,
> even if less important ones fail. The best way to meet that
> requirement might be different for each type of application
> protocol. Neither the charter text nor the list of deliverables
> recognizes such differentiation; they simply assume that precedence
> and preemption are the only possible solutions.

Forgive me a naive question but what is there other than precedence or 
preemption?

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf