Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?



I received four of these, apparently on the strength of being an RFC author, and was immediately sure there had been a mistake.

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

Judging from the email addresses where I received solicitations for comments, either every RFC author or every I-D author received an invitation to comment. (I suspect the latter, since the invitations seemed to be tailored by working group, i.e., an I-D in a Transport working group "earned" an invitation that included Transport candidates.)ï Calling a candidate list distributed to all I-D authors private is polite fiction. I don't object to this effective public candidacy, but honesty in labeling might be called for.

-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.