Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> > In other words, Brian, by running the experiment, in its current form, 
> > you are
> > ensuring that meaningful changes can't be made without disruption.
>
> I truly don't get your concern. We have mechanisms today to get
> operational material onto the IETF web site. We won't be siwtching
> those mechanisms off while running the ION experiment. If, which

Then I can't figure out what goes into the 'experiment' and what doesn't. It 
sounds as if this becomes redundant -- ie, extra -- effort.  That reduces the 
incentive to use it.


> I doubt, we decide IONs aren't a success, we will simply post the
> ION material to the web site in the current way. If they are a success,
> we'll consolidate the ION mechanism in the light of experience.
> I don't see disruption either way.

"consolidate" does not mean making changes, or "changes" doesn't mean disruption?

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





Gx3HK-0006pu-Gr
	for ietf at ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:22:46 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx3HI-0003od-48
	for ietf at ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:22:46 -0500
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (adsl-68-122-124-60.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net
	[68.122.124.60]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	kBKFMniq023461
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:22:49 -0800
Message-ID: <45895539.5080907 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:22:33 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
References: <E1Gv9uu-0000UZ-IQ at ietf.org>	<16A81D0C-D7A5-4B19-8FDE-54F105AB2619 at cisco.com>	<458413D7.3050709 at zurich.ibm.com>	<4585F779.8050703 at dcrocker.net>
	<458659BD.60009 at zurich.ibm.com>	<4586D4C1.3050803 at dcrocker.net>
	<4587AB7A.3030804 at zurich.ibm.com>	<4587FD6E.4080508 at dcrocker.net>
	<45880149.7070806 at zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <45880149.7070806 at zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support at songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2 at dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org


Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> > In other words, Brian, by running the experiment, in its current form, 
> > you are
> > ensuring that meaningful changes can't be made without disruption.
>
> I truly don't get your concern. We have mechanisms today to get
> operational material onto the IETF web site. We won't be siwtching
> those mechanisms off while running the ION experiment. If, which

Then I can't figure out what goes into the 'experiment' and what doesn't. It 
sounds as if this becomes redundant -- ie, extra -- effort.  That reduces the 
incentive to use it.


> I doubt, we decide IONs aren't a success, we will simply post the
> ION material to the web site in the current way. If they are a success,
> we'll consolidate the ION mechanism in the light of experience.
> I don't see disruption either way.

"consolidate" does not mean making changes, or "changes" doesn't mean disruption?

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf