"Discuss" criteria

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > But, Brian, the concern for costs ought to extend much farther, such as to 
> > the kinds of issues raised by an IESG Discuss so that the AD provides an 
> > explanation of the benefit that justifies the considerable cost in delay
> > and wg effort they are imposing...
>
> Hence the DISCUSS criteria document, which is a work in progress (and likely
> to become an ION).


Brian,

Which document are you referring to?

The one that I thought you meant has an I-D Tracker status of "dead" and is no 
longer an I-D:

  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=id_detail&id=13314>

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf