Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt

Hi Lakshminath,

On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:20:35AM -0800, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
> 
> On your comment about whether or not a 1 octet field is necessary, my 
> opinion is that it is the most optimal design (cannot be any smaller 
> :)).  I don't think ethertype will work in a generic sense to 
> distinguish multiple parallel EAP conversations (we are not talking 
> about multiple "types" of conversations, but instead multiple 
> conversations).

The draft clearly talks about multiple types of authentications.

Yoshihiro Ohba


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.