Re: "Discuss" criteria status

["Joel M. Halpern" <joel at stevecrocker.com>]

I wonder if we as a community are asking the wrong question in this discussion.

It seems to me that there is a very large value in having a clear 
document that the IESG says documents what they will do.

I personally am much more interested in having a document that serves 
that function, even if I don't like the criteria listed.
If we can get to the point where we have that, then I think it makes 
sense to have a discussion about what changes the community would 
like to see in the IESG procedures.

Is draft-iesg-discuss-criteria-02.txt a statement from the IESG of 
what it is doing?
If not, what is it?
If it is, what I would ask first is that the IESG commit to updating 
this whenever they change the procedures.  (I don't care if it is 
kept as a perpetual I-D, with a pointer so people know it has 
meaning, or a web page, or an ION, or what.)

Then, once we know that, we can have a useful debate on what changes 
we would like to see in what the IESG does.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf