Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard



Hi -

> From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
...
> > Section 5.2 of RFC 3978 addresses the issue, giving the necessary
> > incantation and using MIBs and PIBs as an example.
> 
> You really need to be more specific because I'm hopelessly confused
> here. Section 5.2 talks about the *opposite*, how to give *less*
> rights.

|   In the cases of MIB or PIB modules and in other cases where the
|   Contribution includes material that is meant to be extracted in order
|   to be used, the following should be appended to statement 5.2 (a) or
|   5.2 (b):
|
|      "other than to extract section XX as-is for separate use."

Sorry, the incantation was so clear to me that I missed the over-qualification.

Randy


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.