Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history (Feed Paging and Archiving) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history (Feed Paging and Archiving) to Proposed Standard



The Apache Abdera project [1] has implemented partial support this
specification. We've seen no significant issues other than, perhaps, a
limited number of available implementations and feed instances to test
against.  FWIW, I think moving this forward on the standards track is fine.

- James

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/abdera

The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> 
> - 'Feed Paging and Archiving '
>    <draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  In particular, the IESG would like to know
> of planned implementations and considerations of appropriateness for
> Standards Track.
> 
> Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-02-16. Exceptionally, 
> comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-08.txt
> 
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=13260&rfc_flag=0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.