Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

I certainly consider Geoff and Manfred part of the WG.  I don't think any of these were ignored my Lisa or me, I've read everyone one of them several times. I think that for WG did not come to consensus to adopt these into the WG draft. 

Cullen <with my webdav WG chair hat on>

On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

the only reason why "my" draft doesn't contain resolutions for all (instead of many) open issues is that at some point of time, it didn't seem to matter anymore, as the proposals basically were ignored by you and the editor. Should this change, I could and would finish it.

BTW: it seems that you don't consider Geoff or Manfred to be part of the WG. I'd really like to understand how one could come to that point of view (I'll remind everybody that Geoff is one of the authors of many WebDAV RFCs, and that Manfred has offered a complete rewrite of the locking sections a few months ago).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf