Re: ietf-moms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ietf-moms

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: ietf-moms
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:56:39 +0000
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37010D3E2E@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37010D3E2E@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)


Isn't IETF childcare the microphone in the big room on
Wed & Thurs evenings?

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

Would this be the place to raise the issue of childcare provision at IETF meetings?


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: ietf-moms
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: "Reliable delivery considered harmful."
Next by Date: Re: ietf-moms
Previous by thread: RE: ietf-moms
Next by thread: Re: ietf-moms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.