Re: ion-procdocs open for public comment

[Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>> I liked the I-D better, the xml2rfc HTML output is hard to read.
 
> Really? I find the links in the HTML version invaluable.

Me too, but I prefer the "rfcmarkup" HTML version of the I-D, for
starters it uses a monospaced font, it doesn't spice the output
with character references not supported by my stoneage mozilla-3,
and where it uses comma-separated lists of RFCs or I-Ds they are
visually clearly separated:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap

Maybe you could get a similar effect if you pipe the "unpaginated"
xml2rfc output into "rfcmarkup".  This procedure would kill UTF-8
and meta data, however.  Something is missing, probably xml2rfc
needs an additional output style XHTML resulting in an emulation
of rfcmarkup style, but using UTF-8, and preserving any meta data.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf