Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
- To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey at cisco.com>
- Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
- From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:20:44 -0500
- Cc: lorenzo at cisco.com, ietf at ietf.org, "Isidor Kouvelas \(kouvelas\)" <kouvelas at cisco.com>, secdir at mit.edu, "Tony Speakman \(speakman\)" <speakman at cisco.com>, pim-chairs at tools.ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org, M.Handley at cs.ucl.ac.uk
- In-reply-to: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50335D7F2@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com>
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Organization: Columbia University
- References: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50335D7F2@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey at cisco.com> wrote:
> I would like to understand better why ...
> no automated key management
> is specified.
>
Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
