Re: Last Call: draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines (Guidance on Area Director Sponsoring of Documents) to Informational RFC

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Scott,
> rfc 2026 says what must be done in some cases - it does not say what
> can not be done in the cases it does not cover - specifically, RFC 2026
> in no way would block a 4-week last call for an informational RFC
> - note that RFC 2026 does not require any last call for informationals
>   
Right, I didn't mean to imply there was an upper limit.
Its always a judgment call.
> fwiw - I agree with John - this doc warents a longer last call because
> it does impact how part of the IETF process will work and the draft
> did not get vetted in a normal working group process
>   
That's a fair statement. I believe Brian just told
us that he's not in a rush, so he's not cutting
the discussion off too early. But its his call if
he officially changes the last call period.

Jari


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf