Re: Last Call: draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines (Guidance on AreaDirector Sponsoring of Documents) to Informational RFC

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

> - I'm lost about why we would continue to publish Informational process 
> RFCs (ignoring any existing pipeline of process documents remaining to 
> be published as RFCs).

To me the argument for making this one an RFC is mainly that it
fits together with the two other drafts mentioned previously,
which pretty clearly need to be RFCs. But it wouldn't give me
any heartburn if the community consensus is to make it an ION.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf