Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard

[Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Denis" == Denis Pinkas <denis.pinkas at bull.net> writes:

    Denis> Sam,
    >>>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> writes:

    Russ> Denis: I do not consider these to be new comments.  You made
    Russ> them during WG Last Call, and there was considerable
    Russ> discussion on the S/MIME WG mail list.  In the end, you were
    Russ> unable to gain any support for your position.  Why do you
    Russ> feel I need to respond to the same comments again?

    >> I tend to agree with Russ.

    Denis> I do not see how it may be possible to reach a consensus if
    Denis> a dialogue is not accepted.

Russ is the editor.  You said that you have already brought these
issues up in the WG.  It is no longer Russ's job to engage with you if
he does not want to.

It is the WG chairs' job to describe the reasoning for why your
comments were rejected during the WG discussion and I've asked the
chairs to do that.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf