Re: About Gen-ART reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: About Gen-ART reviews

To: Adrian Farrel <adrian at olddog.co.uk>, Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: About Gen-ART reviews
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:49:46 -0500
Cc: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>
In-reply-to: <018a01c74faf$1269e770$0d01a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <45D1B023.9000705@zurich.ibm.com> <018a01c74faf$1269e770$0d01a8c0@your029b8cecfe>

On Tuesday, February 13, 2007 08:33:44 PM +0000 Adrian Farrel <adrian at olddog.co.uk> wrote:

The main IETF mailing list is a compromise, but not particularly good as
it may obscure the other traffic on the list.

Oh, yes; it would be a shame if discussion of documents in IETF Last Call caused someone to miss the latest flamefest.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- About Gen-ART reviews
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: About Gen-ART reviews
  - From: Adrian Farrel

Prev by Date: Re: About Gen-ART reviews
Next by Date: Re: About Gen-ART reviews
Previous by thread: Re: About Gen-ART reviews
Next by thread: Re: About Gen-ART reviews
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.