![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi - >From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com> >Sent: Feb 11, 2007 4:15 AM >To: 'John Cowan' <cowan at ccil.org>, Doug Ewell <dewell at adelphia.net> >Cc: ietf-languages at iana.org, LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>, ietf at ietf.org >Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Ta g MIB) to Proposed Standard > >Hi, > >Right - ASN.1 doesn't allow discontinuous integer ranges. ... No. In a SIZE qualifier, a discontiguous range is perfectly legal ASN.1 There are examples of this in RFC 2579, among others. In this particular case, something like SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0 | 2..60)) (replacing 60 with whatever the consensus upper bound should be) would seem appropriate. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.