Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard

To: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester at edelweb.fr>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:36:45 -0500
Cc: "blake at sendmail.com" <blake at sendmail.com>, "turners at ieca.com" <turners at ieca.com>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>, Denis Pinkas <denis.pinkas at bull.net>
In-reply-to: <45D4B359.9090705@edelweb.fr> (Peter Sylvester's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:24:09 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <OF64B82F32.E78BD74E-ONC125727D.0052E0DC@frcl.bull.fr> <45D47346.20907@edelweb.fr> <45D4B359.9090705@edelweb.fr>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

My individual opinion is that these changes are a matter of style, and
that the current text is fine.  If there is strong support for these
changes I can enter an rfc editor note.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Denis Pinkas
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Peter Sylvester
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Peter Sylvester

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Beware of fake pills
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: [no subject]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign (CryptographicMessageSyntax(CMS) Multiple Signer Clarification) to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.