Re: Identifications dealing with Bulk Unsolicited Messages (BUMs)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Identifications dealing with Bulk Unsolicited Messages (BUMs)
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
> If this was effective, blacklists would have solved the spam problem.
They are 90% effective which I think is pretty good. You can't expect to
eliminate spam, so using 100% effectiveness as a criterion for "solving
the spam problem" is pointless.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
DOGGER: NORTHWEST 4 OR 5. SLIGHT OR MODERATE. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
