RE: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document



Please find below my comments:

1. The IETF LC mentions only the DOWNREF for RFC 3576. However, there is
another DOWNREF for RFC 2866 which is not mentioned in the LC. 
2. Reference [1] fails to name the RFC number (2119)
3. It would be useful to include expansion of the acronyms at first
occurrence, even if they are borrowed from RADIUS documents. For example
NAS. 
4. There is a formatting issue (empty or non-aligned bullet) in Section
5.8 at page 27
5. The contact persons for experts in external organizations TADIG and
REALM are mentioned by their personal e-mail address in the table in
Section 11.1. This is not appropriate for an RFC. If TADIG or REALM
cannot provide a semi-permanent alias for their nominated experts, there
should be at least some text that mentions that the addresses belong to
the nominated experts at the date of the approval of the document and if
these addresses are no longer available readers are directed to TADIG or
REALM. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext at ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext at ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:17 PM
> To: radiusext at ops.ietf.org
> Subject: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Geographic 
> Location/Privacy WG
> (geopriv) to consider the following document:
> 
> - 'Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS '
>    <draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> This draft has a downref to RFC 3576 but 3576 is only used 
> for an optional feature of "Mid-session Authorization".
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and 
> solicits final comments on this action.  Please send 
> substantive comments to the ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 
> 2007-02-19. Exceptionally,  comments may be sent to iesg at 
> ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning 
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-
> lo-10.txt
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie
> w_id&dTag=12340&rfc_flag=0
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request at ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.