RE: Identifications dealing with Bulk Unsolicited Messages (BUMs)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Identifications dealing with Bulk Unsolicited Messages (BUMs)
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> The question Brian raised is not the percentage of spam that blacklists
> catch, it's the false positive rate.
Yes, you have to be careful about which blacklists you use and how you use
them. The reputable ones (e.g. Spamhaus) have a negligible FP rate.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
LUNDY FASTNET IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY 4 OR 5, INCREASING 6 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY
ROUGH, BUT MODERATE IN IRISH SEA. SHOWERS. GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
