Re: AW: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying LocationObjects in RADIUS

[Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us>]

Hannes,

I haven't had time to go through these items either, much less time  
to compare them against the wglc comments from both GEOPRIV and  
RADEXT (https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2006/msg00698.html).  If  
these are new issues, it is unsettling that they did not surface  
during the cross-area review.

-andy

On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes wrote:

> Hi Bernard,
>
> I received your review. I need more time to process it given its  
> length.
> In fact the length of your review surprised me a bit given the long  
> (>16 months) discussion we already had about the document.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba at hotmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. März 2007 06:45
> > > An: ietf at ietf.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo
> > > (Carrying LocationObjects in RADIUS
> > >
> > > This is a repost of 2 messages previously sent to the
> > > ietf at ietf.org list
> > > which did not make it to the list.  They are being re-sent
> > > here at the
> > > request of the RAI ADs.
>
> ~snip~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf