![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Michael,
On 2007-03-02 16:19, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: ...
No real disagreement here but I do see a way forward. First, clarify the
terminology. Second publish a pair of RFCs rather like 1009 entitled
"Requirements for Consumer Internet Gateways" and "Requirements for
Enterprise Internet Gateways".
Are you aware of RFC 4084 "Terminology for Describing Internet Connectivity"?
It is a rather different take on the same problem.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.