RE: NATs as firewalls
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NATs as firewalls

> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc at zurich.ibm.com] 

> John,
> 
> (after also reading Michael's response)
> 
> I don't disagree. I think there is scope for writing a list 
> of desirable properties for SOHO routers in the light of 
> these various inputs. I'm less certain it can be done for 
> enterprise boundary routers. But it would be a tricky and 
> contentious job in both cases. Even draft-ietf-v6ops-nap took 
> many moons and several major editing passes, and it only 
> starts the work.

SOHO is the one that won't get done otherwise. The enterprise folk have Gartner, Burton and the Jericho forum to express their list of requirements through (and the RFP process to put those requirements on the vendor product roadmaps).

From the SOHO perspective I have been sayžŠÝz»hr§ëazËZµêÚ«¶§Šjezg§¶)ට‚

















Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.






Note:  Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.