Re: NATs as firewalls

To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd at dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: NATs as firewalls
From: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:55:40 -0800
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, ietf at ietf.org, alh-ietf at tndh.net
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=263; t=1173297346; x=1174161346; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20NATs=20as=20firewalls |Sender:=20; bh=JLvoa5iGfso7Z+iPtZ6o8ocQKAPSTuESfrVNDux7g4Y=; b=IIXz2LOzarF+XWuBrKR6lCvlgDz/XoFDlgQlHUa3N/YHO7Na8RnYuHct6lBZAOCqhqmdPQnE o+HBlRlw2PEaWdb+GaoKNK63oiQk0sbX2+q4D+UmhwfS4IYwNYC3zFt6;
In-reply-to: <45EF14A4.5060107@dial.pipex.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <2DA00C5A2146FB41ABDB3E9FCEBC74C1014F1E30@i2km07-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net> <45EB1882.4060507@zurich.ibm.com> <567D10C7E4B94209E4A50641@p3.JCK.COM> <45EBF476.40104@zurich.ibm.com> <1e8d01c76049$b64f06e0$22ed14a0$@net> <5483A0FFA8E000A2EFC4E5EB@p3.JCK.COM> <45EF14A4.5060107@dial.pipex.com>


On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote:

Also this appears to be tied to the US business model where the ISP supplies you with the box and you don't get to change it (or even own it).


Do they do that in the US? I'm not aware of it...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NATs as firewalls
  - From: Elwyn Davies

References:
- RE: NATs as firewalls
  - From: michael.dillon
- Re: NATs as firewalls
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs as firewalls
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: NATs as firewalls
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- RE: NATs as firewalls
  - From: Tony Hain
- RE: NATs as firewalls
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: NATs as firewalls
  - From: Elwyn Davies

Prev by Date: Re: NATs as firewalls
Next by Date: Re: NATs as firewalls
Previous by thread: Re: NATs as firewalls
Next by thread: Re: NATs as firewalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: NATs as firewalls

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.