RE: NATs as firewalls

[John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>]

--On Wednesday, 07 March, 2007 10:14 -0800 "Hallam-Baker,
Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com> wrote:

>...
> IPv6 is not inevitable, the issue is how to make it so. I
> believe that we need a branding scheme that tells the user
> that they are getting a next generation Internet hookup, that
> they have a next generation router box etc. and that the
> presence of the brand means that they can absolutely expect
> everything they want to work to simply work without the
> current level of fuss.
>...

And that takes us full circle back to RFC 4084 (or a possible
update to it), so it is probably time for me to drop out of the
conversation.

    john




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf