Re: Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>]

Robert Sayre schrieb:
> > The IESG has received a request from the Atom Publishing Format and 
> > Protocol WG (atompub) to consider the following document:
> >
> > - 'The Atom Publishing Protocol '
> >    <draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> By my count, draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt has generated over 250 
> on-topic comments on the WG list since March 06, when the version was 
> announced. It is clearly not ready for publication. I don't think it is 
> appropriate for the IETF as a whole to review this document.

+ 0,5.

The document got lots of constructive feedback in the previous weeks 
(mainly due to fresh eyes), and I think it would be worthwhile to 
resolve most of the issues that were raised before doing the Last Call. 
This will save lots of time spent by new reviewers raising new issues.

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf