Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

On 2007-03-14 04:29, David Kessens wrote:
> John,
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:04:52AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> > If the IESG is going to claim a silent majority in favor of
> > approving this document, so be it.  But to claim that there were
> > no Last Call comments and that those that were solicited were
> > positive is deeply problematic.    It even leads one to wonder
> > whether the IESG has ignored critical comments in other cases,
> > but I trust that has not occurred.
>
> For the record, not everybody in the IESG was convinced that this
> document should be approved considering the discussion that happened
> on the IETF list.

I can testify that there would have been at least one DISCUSS if this
had stayed on the standards track, even without the Last Call comments.
But as Experimental, it seemed to me that we had no reason to
block it.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf