Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>]

Brian E Carpenter schrieb:
> On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> > The text that got used in CalDAV (which is about to be published) is:
> >
> >   o  MUST support transport over TLS [RFC2246] as defined in [RFC2818]
> >      (note that [RFC2246] has been obsoleted by [RFC4346]);
> >
> > with 2246, 2818 and 4346 all normative references. These type of 
> > "up-references" are not ideal and I believe there was some discussion 
> > going on somewhere about how better to deal with this type of situation.
> ...

As pointed out before, that text really is confusing. As a reader. I'm 
left wondering whether I need to implement RFC2246 or RFC4346. Or both?

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf