Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A

To: ietf at ietf.org, arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no
Subject: Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A
From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Cc: trustees at ietf.org, braden at ISI.EDU
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

  *> 
  *> I assume most/all IETF regulars at the time knew the Copyright Story. 
  *> But tourists like myself could also publish RFCs, and I wouldn't jump 
  *> to conclusions about their/our agreeing with the unstated agreement.
  *> 
  *> Arnt
  *> 

So, would it surprise you to find out now that someone else actually
owns your text and can restrict the way others use it?  I'll be you
would be surprised... you ASSUMED it was "public domain", in those
simpler times.

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A
  - From: Arnt Gulbrandsen

Prev by Date: Re: Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
Next by Date: Re: Seeking a new IAB Executive Director
Previous by thread: Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A
Next by thread: Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: item for discussion - IAOC Q&A

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.