Re: Fwd: Pingsta Invitation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Pingsta Invitation

To: <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Pingsta Invitation
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian at olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:55:50 +0100
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
References: <20070324073152.6DDB81BA16@www.pingsta.com><BE5D8067-3A73-4D92-9AA1-A5BDBBC4E84E@cisco.com> <Pine.OSX.4.64.0703241053510.222@mini.local>
Reply-to: Adrian Farrel <adrian at olddog.co.uk>

"Stephen Casner" <casner at acm.org> wrote...

I don't know anything about Pingsta or its credibility.  However, I am
currently reading a boot...


Yes, this has to be a new and innovative communication method :-)

Adrian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pingsta Invitation
  - From: Joe Abley

References:
- Fwd: Pingsta Invitation
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: Fwd: Pingsta Invitation
  - From: Stephen Casner

Prev by Date: RE: Pingsta Invitation
Next by Date: DOS boot?
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: Pingsta Invitation
Next by thread: Re: Pingsta Invitation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.