Re: In support of symbolic references

[Elwyn Davies <elwynd at dial.pipex.com>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Simon,
> >
> > > Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
> > +1
> >
> > (I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
> > Klensin's concern.)
>
> Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
> bad idea. 
The 'default; in the templates on the RFC Editor's webpage 
(http://www.rfc-editor.org/formatting.html) are already set to give 
symbolic references,
> If you want to suggest a change in the default,
> writing to xml2rfc at lists.xml.resource.org is a good first move.
There is an issue with 'no surprises' as Marshall has written on that list.

/Elwyn
>     Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf