Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

On 2007-04-20 09:21, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
DHCP is not a great choice in a mobile environment and also not when it comes to more complex location representations. 

Why can't a mobile system have a locally valid DHCP record (+/- the length
of a wireless link)? For that matter, why couldn't a DHCP server have
real-time triangulation data, if it exists at all?

Do you mean more complex than can be expressed by RFC 4776 and RFC 3825 together?

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.