 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry this reply is late. I suspect you were stuck in ISC's greylisters. On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:48:14AM -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > That's not the point, the point here is that DHCP is not an Internet > protocol. It is an IETF protocol but not an Internet protocol. It does > not layer on the IP stack. You're right, I muddled the point. The point is that the ISO L(x) is not what one considers when judging wether or not a certain configuration value "would make a good band name. I mean DHCP option." What we (strive to) consider instead is the administrative scope of the configuration information, and wether it matches common and practical use of DHCP. -- David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again." Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
Attachment:
pgpi1LgBLRdnU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.