Re: Last Call: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility) to Informational RFC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility) to Informational RFC




As far as I can tell, there are three people that have posted an email abut this document in and some of theses got back to early 2005. I don't think this document has received adequate review from the SIP community.


It seems like the SH mode is preferable to the MMC mode in general because it allows the call to transfer to a device that does not have the limitations of the MN - and often that is why it was transfered in the first place. For example. if the MN did not understand video but the user wanted to transfer the call to a video phone.

It seems like the SIP URI for the device should be a GRUU.

It seems like you need to say what SLP services template-type for this to work.

I wonder how the MNC mode works with security such as say DTLS-SRTP given it is acting as a man in the middle.

When transferring to multiple devices, I think that devices today don't actually support this (as the document points out in first para of section 5.3.3) - I think that an option tag is needed to indicate support for this.

I'm not sure that the OPTION message is required to return all the codec a device can support - for one thing that often dynamically changes depending on what else is going on in video devices.

I can't really see how the SH mode will work without a require / supported tag.

Cullen < with my individual hat on>

PS - I gave this a very quick skim so I apologize if I misunderstood thing.


On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:14 AM, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:


- 'Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility '
<draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility-03.txt> as an Informational RFC



The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-05-10. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.


The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shacham-sipping-session- mobility-03.txt



IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi? command=view_id&dTag=12922&rfc_flag=0



_______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.