Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow

To: Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org>
Subject: Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:42:40 +0200
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, ipfix at ietf.org, standards-ipr at cisco.com, "Peter Lei \(peterlei\)" <peterlei at cisco.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise at cisco.com>
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=579; t=1180010572; x=1180874572; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Putting=20IPR=20on=20IPFIX=20while=20the=20target=20o f=20IPFIX=20is=20to=20in=20effect=0A=20open=20NetFlow |Sender:=20; bh=RgEcFjcY7F/7en/+efh1/9oelrseE+4fPo3hwsasJdQ=; b=NA4Mp5tIhs1JFYZduCWaTqLI2Jzuw2/AqOAmCyqa/4ICD0Emm9BdJW32nGVcP5KbE1VU1oaB u5Zi9FH47avi8Zd74232JI4qBpohDoBzlggegeV5WuuDuv5WXz8CIweK;
In-reply-to: <87ejl633z4.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <3167F18F59B81B4888A4D4C0A1717DD6670FAD@mhdexc02.adhel.hitachi-eu.com> <4603B7DC.1000906@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <46540EB3.8090803@cisco.com> <2137839979-1179914927-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-393953731-@bwe002-cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <46543151.4000908@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com> <46555604.3060206@gmail.com> <87ejl633z4.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)

[Not speaking in any way for Cisco on this issue...]

Simon Josefsson wrote:

Such clauses may be acceptable when we know what the patent is, and what it covers, but this refer to unpublished patent applications. This particular license also explicitly enable Cisco to collect retroactive royalties against anyone who sues Cisco over _any_ patent. I don't believe these are acceptable terms for a Standards Track document.

Just imagine the number of lawsuits that would exist if everyone did things this way. Stallman should be jealous.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP)
  - From: Jeroen Massar
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP)
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
  - From: Simon Josefsson

Prev by Date: Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
Next by Date: Re: On the IETF Consensus process
Previous by thread: Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
Next by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.