Re: On the IETF Consensus process

To: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti at qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: On the IETF Consensus process
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:05:21 +0100
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <46576DAA.10705@qualcomm.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0705251548530.28388-100000@citation2.av8.net> <46576DAA.10705@qualcomm.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)


I generally disregard messages that say things like
"we need to..." a bunch of times but never say what
or exactly why.

If there's something you want, can't you say what it
is, so we can see if it makes sense?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti

References:
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.