Re: consensus and anonymity
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: consensus and anonymity
- To: todd glassey <tglassey at earthlink.net>, John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, Michael Thomas <mat at cisco.com>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
- Subject: Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:26:29 -0400
- Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
- Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=508; t=1180639587; x=1181503587; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20consensus=20and=20anonymity |Sender:=20 |To:=20todd=20glassey=20<tglassey@earthlink.net>, =20John=20C=20Klensin=20 <john-ietf@jck.com>, =0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mat@cis co.com>, =0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=22Hallam-Baker, =20Phillip=22=20<pbaker @verisign.com>; bh=kyc6yUU0aPoyttnjPEQYDxUe9/J5XFnUTYIAfZdGvRI=; b=gdwItnISm86zcx5+q8d6nQt4TGDpcuxOo4o3eDvV5Lqn0DAFJZqw7hnmaxv1RGb2LVMdOGJJ nf04CCbvCZ+Wao0Zp8YqnlmJ0KPfkbt9BQF9sRuMZGZIA8nVkIfrrm86;
- In-reply-to: <005701c7a3b9$14afa0c0$174f7d40@home.glassey.com>
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Thread-index: AcejuZZY1Le6ug+sEdyhPwAKleNSdA==
- Thread-topic: consensus and anonymity
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
On 5/31/07 3:21 PM, "todd glassey" <tglassey at earthlink.net> wrote:
> i.e. interferring with others initiatives... this is a serious issue since
> this is Tortuous Interferrence per se.
Actually, Todd, what was I thinking of was people who aren't
capable of graciously moving out of the way after they've
made their point and "lost." People who threaten lawsuits
and whatnot. They really make it extremely difficult to
finalize a decision and they poison the decision-making
process.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
