Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP





--On Saturday, June 09, 2007 20:00 +0000 John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to
send emails at 2 am? :-)

Perhaps a sentence or two clarifying that this only applies to SMTP and SUBMIT would be in order

But there are a large number of SOHO and consumer boxes, designed for use as firewalls, etc., which are capable of sending out mail via SMTP containing their logs. They are not multi-user, are presumably difficult to compromise by virus or worm, and are typically configured only to send mail to SMTP servers they protect and hence presumably trust. Given the prohibitions in this document, where are those devices left? Am I correct in assuming that this document would intend to prohibit those devices as non-conforming?


     john


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.