Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
--On Saturday, June 09, 2007 20:00 +0000 John Levine
<johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to
send emails at 2 am? :-)
Perhaps a sentence or two clarifying that this only applies to
SMTP and SUBMIT would be in order
But there are a large number of SOHO and consumer boxes,
designed for use as firewalls, etc., which are capable of
sending out mail via SMTP containing their logs. They are not
multi-user, are presumably difficult to compromise by virus or
worm, and are typically configured only to send mail to SMTP
servers they protect and hence presumably trust. Given the
prohibitions in this document, where are those devices left?
Am I correct in assuming that this document would intend to
prohibit those devices as non-conforming?
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.