![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I don't understand "BCP." Information RFC yes. Something that can be use for requirements yes. But Best Common Practice? How is an operator's "I wish my equipment can do this in my network" become a BCP? IESG - I think we are abusing the BCP system. It states: A BCP document is subject to the same basic set of procedures as standards track documents and thus is a vehicle by which the IETF community can define and ratify the community's best current thinking on a statement of principle or on what is believed to be the best way to perform some operations or IETF process function." Which means we should be going through the same lifecycle of document status as the standards track. What we are getting now is the equivelent of a straight to Internet Standard status. > -----Original Message----- > From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary at ietf.org] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 1:34 PM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: opsec at ops.ietf.org > Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering > and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP > > The IESG has received a request from the Operational Security > Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG (opsec) to > consider the following document: > > - 'Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network > Infrastructure ' > <draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps-08.txt> as a BCP > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and > solicits final comments on this action. Please send > substantive comments to the ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by > 2007-06-25. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to > iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-filter-ca > ps-08.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie > w_id&dTag=13825&rfc_flag=0 > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce at ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.