Re: Type I vs. Type II errors
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Type I vs. Type II errors



On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:52:58AM -0700,
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote 
 a message of 37 lines which said:

> There is nearly exclusive concern about preventing all cases of
> problems, no matter how occasional or minor, with little apparent
> concern for the affirmative need to *faciliate* progress.

True. If IP had been subject to the same level of scrutiny that is
applied to Identifier/locator separation proposals on the RAM list, we
would never have adopted IP (a protocol with so many security
holes)...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.