Re: Type I vs. Type II errors

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

>> There is nearly exclusive concern about preventing all cases of
>> problems, no matter how occasional or minor, with little apparent
>> concern for the affirmative need to *faciliate* progress.
>>     
>
> True. If IP had been subject to the same level of scrutiny that is
> applied to Identifier/locator separation proposals on the RAM list, we
> would never have adopted IP (a protocol with so many security
> holes)...
>   
perhaps. but IP was designed in a more naive, and less hostile, time. 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf