![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Robert Elz wrote:And in this case, this is exactly the point. IANA is the INTERNET Assigned Numbers Authority, not the IETF Assigned Numbers Authority - and the code points it assigns and the registries it maintains are used by the Internet as a whole, not just that part of it that participates in the IETF.In my opinion: No. There's no magic in names.
The IANA is a function carried out by a department of ICANN. It has inherited the name from the work done by Jon Postel since the time when the Internet was small enough that all the users knew each other by name. But there is no magic in the name that makes this department have any more credibility than any other group that performs functions.
We, as the IETF, whose mission it is to "make the Internet work better", need to look at what the function we want to have performed is, and whether the current entity is the best one to perform the function we want performed.
And we did, which is why there is an MoU and an SLA in place between the IETF and IANA, both of which were open for debate here before they were concluded.
Brian
Others have to perform the same evaluation when entrusting their registration functions to this entity.
The name is just a name.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.