![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
- Jim
On Jun 13, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[bcc'd someone from Verilan who can most likely comment on this :) ]
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:i'm wondering about IPv6 connectivity at chicago IETF69. if any of you have hints about it, please drop me a note. if there's no plan for IPv6, i'd be more than happy to help out, as always.
It seems that VeriLAN (http://www.verilan.com) is taking on the NOC role
again, they did, from what I understood, a great job in Prague*. A
search using their own search toy for "IPv6" didn't result in any hits
though and google doesn't seem to know about it either.
In the possible case that no IPv6 (native) connectivity can be arranged,
there is a SixXS PoP in Chicago, courtesy of OCCAID, this box is up and
running and can easily provide a fast stable tunnel + /48 to the site if
needed. Just yell in case help there is needed.
Greets, Jeroen
* = http://tools.ietf.org/group/iaoc/wiki/VeriLAN
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.