Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)



>>> We could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce the
>>> per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward,
>>>   
>>>       
>> It's not clearly even a way forward.  the more ADs there are, the harder
>> it is to coordinate between the ADs and the areas.
>>     
>
> Yes, each AD becomes less efficient
not just that, but at some point the more ADs you add, the less useful
work IESG as a whole gets done.  as of the time I was on IESG, we were
close to that point already.  IMHO.

Keith


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.