![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Brian E Carpenter wrote:draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel, published October 2003, proposed something of that sort.
On 2007-06-27 15:52, Joe Touch wrote:
Keith Moore wrote:It isn't an issue of individual efficiency. A committee of 15 is already
Yes, each AD becomes less efficient, but perhaps the goal shouldn't beWe could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce theIt's not clearly even a way forward. the more ADs there are, the harder
per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward,
it is to coordinate between the ADs and the areas.
the efficiency of the individual volunteers but the ability to be more
inclusive in who we can consider for these roles.
unwieldy given our desire for consensus; the IESG thought long and
carefully before the last increase (from 6 to 7 Areas). I don't see
how it can be increased further.
I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having sub-ADs report to them.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.