Re: Updating the rules?

[Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>]

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 09:29 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I posted draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-00.txt at
> Russ Housley's request. Obviously, discussion is very much
> wanted.
> 
>      Brian
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-00.txt
> 
>     This document proposes a number of changes to RFC 2026, the basic
>     definition of the IETF standards process.  While some of them are
>     definite changes to the rules, the intention is to preserve the main
>     intent of the original rules, while adapting them to experience and
>     current practice.

In:

3.  Detailed Proposals for Change

Acronyms could be structured to clarify extensions versus stand-alone.

Perhaps acronyms could look something like:

SMTP
SMTP/Text-Format
SMTP/Host-Reqs
SMTP/Msg-Size
SMTP/Anti-Spam
SMTP/Auth
SMTP/Pipelining
SMTP/Binary-Mime
SMTP/TLS
SMTP/DSN
SMTP/Multipart
SMTP/Enhanced-Status
SMTP/Ext-DSN
SMTP/Auto-Response
SMTP/Submission 

-Doug


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf