Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity

[itojun at itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)]

> Thus spake "Keith Moore" <moore at cs.utk.edu>
> > NAT-PT really needs to be wiped off the face of the earth.  It
> > provides all of the disadvantages of IPv4+NAT with all of the
> > transition costs of IPv6.
> 
> Indeed it does.  However, it has significant benefits as well:
(snip)

	cannot agree more.  i do not care if it is based on TCP/UDP relaying
	(per session) or NAT-PT (per packet), but IPv6-to-IPv4 translators
	have its own benefits.  and of course drawbacks, but the drawback
	is much smaller than conventional IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT as we have an escape
	plan (use native IPv6).

itojun

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf